F3 Architects’ Tottenham Hotspur towers accepted at attraction | Information

F3 Architects’ Tottenham Hotspur towers accepted at attraction | Information

Tottenham Hotspur FC and F3 Architects have had their proposals for an 867-home improvement on land close to the soccer membership’s north London stadium accepted at attraction after Haringey Council rejected the scheme final yr.

F3’s scheme would ship the properties in towers of 32, 29 and 27 storeys – in addition to lower-rise buildings – on land off White Hart Lane, to the west of Spurs’ £1bn Populous-designed stadium. The location brings collectively two plots often known as the Items Yard and the Depot, which already had current planning consents for as much as 650 properties. Each plots are owned by Spurs.

Haringey Council planning officers had advisable the Spurs proposal for approval. However councillors rejected it, citing issues concerning the peak, breadth and spacing of the scheme’s three towers, which they mentioned would have an “unacceptable hostile impact” on views of the realm.

Councillors additionally criticised the architectural high quality of F3’s proposals and their influence on close by listed buildings.

Following an eight-day listening to in July, planning inspector Jonathan Manning overturned the refusal in a second victory for Spurs and F3 in relation to the Items Yard website. In 2019 the duo received approval at attraction for a twin-tower improvement that proposed 319 new properties. 

Goods Yard 5

Manning’s determination on the most recent proposals, issued on the finish of final month, acknowledged the scheme would “trigger hurt in a number of methods”, together with a low-level of hurt to the character and look of the native space and “lower than substantial hurt” to the importance of a number of designated heritage property.

Nevertheless, Manning mentioned the scheme’s advantages included delivering 867 new properties – of which a minimal of 35% shall be “inexpensive” – at a time when Haringey can not display a five-year provide of housing land, and that the proposals would additionally contribute to Tottenham’s wider regeneration.

Manning added that the scheme would additionally safe the way forward for two early 18th century grade II-listed buildings on Tottenham Excessive Highway and the locally-listed Stationmaster’s Home.

“The advantages of the scheme are very substantial certainly and the recognized hurt doesn’t considerably and demonstrably outweigh these advantages,” he mentioned.

Goods Yard 4

Manning acknowledged {that a} separate architectural evaluation of the proposals had discovered that the peak, breadth and massing of the tall buildings would “end in an abrupt change in scale” in contrast with the native townscape, with an “incongruous impact” on quite a lot of views.

Nevertheless he mentioned the spacing between the towers within the attraction proposals was higher than that in already-approved schemes for the positioning.

“When it comes to architectural design, I’m in settlement with the assessor that the proposed buildings would have extremely articulated facades with a spread of supplies, textures, colors, tones and layers of depth that will be set out in well-proportioned bays that will end in an exemplary normal of architectural high quality,” he mentioned.

The Items Yard and Depot websites are additionally a part of Haringey Council’s wider Excessive Highway West regeneration proposals for Tottenham, masterplanned by Studio Egret West. These plans embrace the redevelopment of the Love Lane Property to the south of White Hart Lane.

A 2,600-home model of that masterplan, developed together with Lendlease, was accepted by Haringey councillors in late July. A 2,900-home model of the scheme was pulled from a gathering in March after a last-minute objection from Spurs.

Constructing Design requested Tottenham Hotspur for a response to its newest planning-appeal victory. The membership declined the chance to supply one.

Goods Yard 9

Related Posts

Leave a Reply